Treatment outcome of hepatocellular carcinoma patients with high-risk vascular invasion: a retrospective analysis.

Background: Invasion of major hepatic vessels in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) generally prohibits the surgical treatment. Objective: Analyze outcomes of non-surgical approaches in this group of HCC. Methods: Retrospective review of medical records of 648 HCC admitted to King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital between January 2003 and December 2005 was carried out to select only patients who had unresectable HCC with vascular invasion and hepatic functions-Child-Pugh class-A. Vascular invasion was defined as involvement of portal vein, inferior vena cava (IVC), or their branches identified by imaging techniques. Non-surgical treatments were either transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) or systemic chemotherapy (SCT) in addition to general supportive care. Treatment outcomes of the patients were analyzed. Results: Out of 71 unresectable HCC patients enrolled, 57patients were treated with TACE, while 14 received SCT. In the TACE group, 39 (68%), 7 (12%) and 11 (19%) patients had portal vein, IVC, and both vessels invasion, respectively. In the SCT group; 11 (78%), 1 (7%) and 2 (14%) had invasion of portal vein, IVC, and both vessels, respectively. Median overall survival in both groups was 158 days. Univariate analysis demonstrated that AFP level <1000 ng/mL, tumor size <10 cm, and SCT treatment significantly influenced survival. Additional multivariate analysis confirmed that diameters of tumor, and SCT were independent prognostic factors for good survival. A survival analysis showed longer survival in the SCT group than that of TACE (210 vs. 149 days, p=0.03) group. Conclusion: Survival of HCC patients with major vessels invasion was better when treated with SCT compared to TACE. Future prospective study in larger populations to test the hypothesis is warranted.

Acute mesenteric ischemia: still high mortality rate in the era of 24-hour availability of angiography.

BACKGROUNDS: Acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) is a serious condition with high mortality rate due to difficult and late diagnosis. Early and aggressive evaluation in high risk patients by mesenteric angiography is the key to the reduction in mortality rate. However; many physicians hesitated to perform it because of its availability, the risk of complications and high negative results. This study reviewed outcome of AMI in term of mortality rate, factors associated with mortality and the rate of angiography in high risk patients. MATERIAL AND METHOD: The clinical data of the patients who were diagnosed as AMI were retrospectively reviewed. The clinical outcome was recorded and the factors associated with mortality were analysed. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients were enrolled into this study during 5 years. The mortality rate was 74.3%. There were 22 high risk patients for AMI. The rate of angiography performed in this group was 4.5% (1/22). The factors associated with mortality were age more than 60 years, patients with peritonitis, hypotension, arterial cause, time interval between admission and operation or treatment more than 24 hours, bowel gangrene >100 cms. However all these factors were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: The mortality rate of AMI is still high even at the tertiary hospital where the angiography is available 24 hours. To decrease the mortality rate, the physicians must have the high index of suspicion in high risk patients and do not hesitate to perform early mesenteric angiography.

Risk factors associated with major intraoperative blood loss in hepatic resection for hepatobiliary tumor.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Hepatic resection is the mainstay treatment of hepatobiliary tumor Nowadays, mortality is less than 6%. However, morbidity is still high. Bleeding is one of the most common problems during hepatic resection which can sometimes lead to catastrophe. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the risk factors associated with major blood loss during hepatic resection for hepatobiliary tumor. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A total of 69 consecutive patients who underwent elective hepatic resection for hepatobiliary tumor from May 2002 to April 2004 were enrolled into this retrospective study. The Patients were divided into 2 groups(group I and II) according to the intraoperative blood loss. Patients who had a blood loss of more than 1000 ml were defined as the major blood loss group(group I). Thirteen variable factors were analyzed to determine the risk of major intraoperative blood loss. Operative outcomes between the two groups were also compared. RESULTS: Of the sixty-nine patients, 36 patients were in group I and 33 patients were in group II. 75% of the patients in group I and 36.4% of the patients in group II were transfused. Median blood transfusion in group I and II were 3 and 0 units of packed red cell. Univariate analysis showed tumor size, extent of hepatic resection, tumor pathology and operative time were factors affecting major intraoperative blood loss. However, multivariate analysis showed only operative time and tumor size to be independent risk factors. Patients in group I had higher surgical morbidity and prolonged hospital stay compared with patients in group II. CONCLUSION: Blood loss is still a major concern in performing hepatic resection. From the present study, tumor size and operative time are the independent factors affecting major intraoperative blood loss. Proper screening or a surveillance program may enhance the chance to find small tumors. Refined operative techniques such as anterior approach and liver hanging would facilitate resection for large right sided tumors.